The Geopolitics of SpaceX and Elon Musk
Should one company—and one person—have this much power?
Elon Musk touches everyone’s lives. And increasingly, each of his ventures build on his others, creating a vertically integrated behemoth that is too big to fail. Consider how Musk’s social media site X, formerly Twitter, is automated by Grok, an artificial intelligence assistant created by xAI, which is a subsidiary of Musk’s SpaceX, which just had a spectacular initial public offering and controls Starlink, a satellite internet service used around the world. Together, these companies span not only discourse, big data, and the airwaves, but also the future of truth itself. (Grok is also building Grokipedia, an AI-composed encyclopedia.)
The growing SpaceX empire, with a market value of more than $2 trillion, is no abstract matter for ordinary citizens. Millions of people are now automatically invested in the company through index funds and pension plans following its recent blockbuster listing on Nasdaq. So, what does its immense size and dominance of space mean for geopolitics? If one company—and one man—can determine whether countries or warring parties can have internet access in sensitive areas served only by Starlink, what does that mean for the world?
Elon Musk touches everyone’s lives. And increasingly, each of his ventures build on his others, creating a vertically integrated behemoth that is too big to fail. Consider how Musk’s social media site X, formerly Twitter, is automated by Grok, an artificial intelligence assistant created by xAI, which is a subsidiary of Musk’s SpaceX, which just had a spectacular initial public offering and controls Starlink, a satellite internet service used around the world. Together, these companies span not only discourse, big data, and the airwaves, but also the future of truth itself. (Grok is also building Grokipedia, an AI-composed encyclopedia.)
The growing SpaceX empire, with a market value of more than $2 trillion, is no abstract matter for ordinary citizens. Millions of people are now automatically invested in the company through index funds and pension plans following its recent blockbuster listing on Nasdaq. So, what does its immense size and dominance of space mean for geopolitics? If one company—and one man—can determine whether countries or warring parties can have internet access in sensitive areas served only by Starlink, what does that mean for the world?
On the latest episode of FP Live, I spoke with Quinn Slobodian, a historian at Boston University and the author of several books on capitalism and neoliberalism. He is the co-author, most recently, of Muskism: A Guide for the Perplexed. The transcript that follows focuses on our discussion about SpaceX. For the full interview, including an explanation of what Muskism refers to and why it matters, try the video box atop this page—for subscribers only—or the free FP Live podcast, wherever you get your audio.
Ravi Agrawal: Let’s talk about SpaceX. What does it do exactly? Why is it so important?
Quinn Slobodian: The SpaceX IPO prospectus lays it out quite clearly. The way they describe it, it has basically three segments. There is a rocket segment, the Falcon 9 rockets, which have been doing a very good job at running many, many missions, often with the partially reusable rocketry that they pioneered about 10 years ago. Then there is the connectivity segment, which is Starlink. There are now around 10,000 of these low-Earth orbit satellites orbiting the Earth. In [early] 2019, there were zero, so that’s a fairly rapid upgrade. It accounts for about 70 percent of the satellites in orbit. Those provide relatively low l…


Leave a Reply